SAP Certified - Database Administrator - SAP HANA - C_DBADM_2601 Exam Questions

QUESTION NO: 1
A consumer goods company runs an on-premises SAP HANA database for core operational processing and uses SAP HANA Cloud for newer analytical workloads. During a scheduled maintenance window, the database administrator completes preparatory upgrade steps on the on-premises system, but the post-maintenance validation shows that the database services are available while the planned upgrade state has not been reached consistently.
One lifecycle check still reports the previous software level, and dependent validation tasks remain blocked. The operations lead wants the issue resolved within the same window without introducing unnecessary rollback risk. The team can use both administration interfaces and command-level tooling, but they must confirm the upgrade state before handing the system back.
What is the best next action?

QUESTION NO: 2
CHALLENGE 2 - Mixed Landscape Administration Boundary
The analytics group asks to use the SAP HANA Cloud database for early reporting because the on-premises database has been stable after the upgrade. The cloud environment is provisioned, but its administration validation record is separate and not complete. What is the best response?

QUESTION NO: 3
A regional telecom support center performs a planned parameter adjustment for SAP HANA administration. After the change, SAP HANA starts normally and the database remains available. However, an administrator reviewing active settings notices that the parameter appears in the persisted configuration record but is not reflected in the active runtime state used by current sessions. Routine application checks still succeed, so the service desk wants to close the activity.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove that the approved configuration is active, not only stored. The environment must remain available, and any follow-up action must target the configuration activation gap rather than unrelated application behavior.
Which action best resolves the configuration validation issue?

QUESTION NO: 4
A regional safety equipment supplier is preparing an SAP HANA upgrade rehearsal in an on-premises administration environment. The database is available, and the upgrade preparation folder contains a completed readiness checklist. Before execution, the administrator notices that the checklist was signed before the final backup evidence was attached. SAP HANA cockpit shows no current database alert, and the maintenance lead wants to begin the upgrade because the checklist status is marked complete.
The constraint is that the administrator must ensure the rehearsal starts only after lifecycle prerequisites reflect the current preparation state. The decision must not rely on a checklist completion flag that was created before final evidence was available.
What should the administrator do before beginning the upgrade rehearsal?

QUESTION NO: 5
CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
A database administrator proposes accepting the cutover comparison now and adding a note that one configuration value was documented outside the current record. Which response is most defensible?

QUESTION NO: 6
A regional specialty foods company uses SAP HANA for demand forecasting. After a backup schedule adjustment, SAP HANA cockpit shows the newest backup as successful. During resilience review, the administrator finds that the recovery checklist still selects the previous weekly backup as the starting point, while the intended recovery objective requires the most recent successful backup and its dependent log entries. A reviewer proposes approving the checklist because backup execution itself succeeded.
The constraint is that the administrator must prove recovery readiness against the intended recovery objective. The approval cannot depend only on backup success if the documented sequence starts from the wrong artifact.

QUESTION NO: 7
CHALLENGE 2 - Dispatch Simulation Monitoring Baseline
The cutover team has two viable actions: tune workload-related settings now to improve carrier exception dashboards, or preserve monitoring evidence first and tune only if current evidence supports it. Which option best balances performance and evidence quality?

QUESTION NO: 8
CHALLENGE 1 - Recovery Review Configuration Traceability
During recovery readiness review, scheduling test users can open appointment backlog reports from both SAP HANA systems. The newly installed validation database has its active configuration documented, but the upgraded reporting system has one post-upgrade value recorded only in a maintenance handover log. What should the administrator do before accepting the readiness comparison?

QUESTION NO: 9
A regional environmental testing company operates SAP HANA on-premises for laboratory turnaround analytics and is preparing a separate SAP HANA Cloud environment for migration rehearsal. During an administration review, the landscape worksheet shows one shared "administration owner" for both environments, but the operational evidence comes from different tools. SAP HANA cockpit confirms the on-premises system status, while SAP HANA Cloud Central confirms the cloud database status. The worksheet does not show which owner must act on each environment-specific alert or readiness item.
The constraint is that the administrator must make the landscape worksheet actionable without changing the assigned team structure. The handover must distinguish current operations from cloud migration readiness.
Which action best resolves the landscape ownership issue?

QUESTION NO: 10
A regional medical devices distributor is preparing an SAP HANA upgrade rehearsal for an on-premises database. The upgrade package is available, and the database is currently running. Before the rehearsal begins, the administrator compares the maintenance checklist with the validation output and finds that the prerequisite check was completed before the latest package was staged. SAP HANA cockpit still shows normal availability, and the technical lead wants to proceed because the system has not reported an error.
The constraint is that the administrator must base the upgrade decision on preparation evidence that matches the current package state. The rehearsal should not begin from validation output created before the final staged artifact was present.
What should the administrator do before starting the rehearsal?

QUESTION NO: 11
CHALLENGE 1 - Cutover Configuration Evidence Traceability
The cutover coordinator wants to use the first comparison because carrier exception reports opened successfully. The database team later confirms that the upgraded distribution system's administration record does not reflect the configuration state used during testing. Which decision best supports release-quality evidence?

QUESTION NO: 12
CHALLENGE 4 - SIT Recovery Evidence Sequencing
The SIT lead can release the next cycle on schedule using backup completion evidence, or delay the release briefly to include recovery validation for the installed test database and recoverability evidence for the upgraded system. Which path is most defensible?

QUESTION NO: 13
A regional furniture manufacturer is rehearsing migration from SAP HANA on-premises to SAP HANA Cloud. The source export completes, and the cloud database can be queried after import. During review, the administrator finds that the validation workbook records successful query checks but does not show that the cloud target was added to the routine monitoring rotation used by the operations team. The project lead wants approval because the migrated data is visible.
The constraint is that the migration wave must prove that the target can be operated after import, not only queried. The validation pattern must remain repeatable for later SAP HANA Cloud migration waves.
Which recommendation is most appropriate?

QUESTION NO: 14
A regional diagnostics provider uses SAP HANA for laboratory operations analytics. The administrator performs a recovery rehearsal in a validation environment. The restore completes, but the validation notes show that the recovery used a backup chain selected from a manually exported catalog snapshot. The live backup catalog contains a newer log entry that was not included in the exported snapshot. The operations manager wants to accept the rehearsal because the database opened successfully.
The constraint is that the administrator must validate recovery using evidence that reflects the current backup catalog. The rehearsal must prove the recoverable state without relying on stale catalog metadata.
What should the administrator do next?